简介:
Жанр: Classical Orchestral
Страна-производитель диска: Japan
Год издания: 1973 (2010)
Издатель (лейбл): Decca
Номер по каталогу: UCGD 9006
Аудиокодек: DST64 2.0
Тип рипа: image (iso)
Битрейт аудио: 1/2.8224 MHz
Продолжительность: 01:08:10
Источник (релизер): PS3SACD
Наличие сканов в содержимом раздачи: да
Reviews from sa-cd.net:
By akiralx:
A very fine if expensive reissue from Universal Japan.
Boehm"s performance is still a demonstration disc over 30 years after it was made in Vienna"s now-lamented
Sofiensaal, with a wonderful airy feel to the acoustic and an orchestral sound which is both thrillingly
immediate and with a wonderful depth of sound and excellent soundstage.
All of this would count for little if the interpretation was below par, but Boehm"s reading is perhaps pre-
eminent alongside other fine modern performances I have on disc by Klemperer, Wand, Karajan, Muti, Harnoncourt,
and Celibidache - though the last of these, on EMI, is simply indispensable as preserving one of his greatest
performances, a fantastic conception, particularly in the finale, treated as a series of adagio episodes capped
by a mesmerising handling of the coda.
Boehm"s performance is however uniquely satisfying, an unerring view of the whole symphony as a single structure,
with stellar echt-Brucknerian playing from the VPO. The interpretation is less idiosyncratic than Celibidache"s,
but is full of wonderful touches that stamp it as a truly great recording.
Whether the disc is worth the extra bother of accessibilty and outlay above the more readily available (and
cheaper) Decca Legends CD incarnation is debatable, however - but having compared the two there is a discernible
if small superiority from the SACD, mainly in terms of soundstage, but no-one who possesses the Legends CD will
feel shortchanged.
By ramesh:
COMPARATIVE REVIEW Böhm ( Ed Nowak 1953 ) with Wand/Berlin Philharmonic ( 1878/80 version ) SACD in BMG Japan Box
Set BVCC-34123~29
The appearance of Böhm"s famous 1973 version of Bruckner 4 on an expensive stereo only hybrid from Japan raises
the question of whether it"s worth getting, compared to the 24/96 digitisation on the Decca legends reissue of
1999. Even the original CD release was of "demonstration" quality in its day.
For a brief recap on editions, there are three main ones. First version of 1874, as heard on Inbal (Teldec);
First definitive edition of 1878/1880, the commonest nowadays; Revised version of 1886. The butchered Schalk
edition has unfortunately gained currency as it was the basis of the Eulenberg pocket score etc; this was
Furtwängler"s performing edition. The 1878/1880 was edited by Haas, however it was reedited and published by
Nowak in 1953. The Haas has a variant where oboe replaces flute in the trio; Klemperer used this. Böhm uses
Nowak. Having no access to the score, Nowak"s main audible difference to Haas appears to be the excision of the
melodramatic cymbal crash at approx 2:30 into the finale.
Comparison timings for the four movements. Böhm 1973 20:14, 15:34, 11:09, 21:13 ; Karajan 1976 18:14, 14:27,
Celibidache ( EMI 7243 556690 ) has really an extraordinarily spacious and profound "adagio-finale", lauded by
Robert Simpson in his monograph on Bruckner. Apropos of Celibidache, he writes in "The Essence of Bruckner", page
106 …"the demonstration of naturally flexible yet monumentally controlled, related tempi which preserve the vast
…momentum." This is pertinent to Böhm"s rendition, for his spacious tempi could have readily turned into
Kapellmeisterish stodge. However, his experience of operatic pacing over the largest harmonic and structural
spans in Strauss and Wagner surely was an ingredient in capturing one of the greatest Bruckner performances. Into
this architecture Böhm paid full attention to the pointing of the ländler-like details which make this symphony
as witty and charming as it is stentorian and majestic. Obviously, it also helped that he was able to energise
the Vienna Philharmonic into demonic playing that would be matched in Kleiber"s Beethoven 5 with them the next
year.
The engineers in the Sofiensaal made one of the greatest ever symphonic recordings, far superior to the sound the
DG engineers were able to offer Kleiber"s Beethoven with the same orchestra. Its spaciousness allows the magical
tremolandi and horn calls to blend into the hall acoustic. There is no need to delve in detail on this famous
performance, but a few salient points. Karajan"s sound was more homogenised, both in his balances and recording,
which suited his seamless legato. Böhm was less interested in beauty via homogeneity. Compared to all above
listed versions, he allows the entire gamut of temperaments in the brass writing to emerge. The recording
captures his multiple variants of string tremolandi at the lowest dynamic levels.
These varieties of string textures are harder to hear in the Karajan and Barenboim versions. I attended two of
the Barenboim Berlin Phil concerts from which his Teldec recording was culled. At least in this work he was
unable to elicit the distinctions between ominous, expectant and relaxed pianissimo that Böhm and Wand were able
to achieve. From these dynamic subtleties, to the horns from their merest glimmer over the strings to their full
cry, all was captured by the 1973 Decca engineers in the Sofiensaal. Interestingly, like Kleiber"s Beethoven 5,
it is the slow movement which is a notch lower in distinction, at least prior to the development of its climax.
In large measure this is due to the relative absence of the passages of shimmering tremolo for strings which Böhm
utilised with such shrewdness in the opening movement. Celibidache and Barenboim are here even slower to the
point of sluggishness. Furtwängler the most gauntly deliberate of all at around 18 minutes, but he was able to
sustain this tempo with unflagging concentration. Nevertheless, the overriding impression is a Brucknerian
reworking of Siegfried"s funeral march.
The reason for citing these details is that timbral fidelity and low level acoustic detail are what one would
expect from high resolution media. I never had the LPs. Having all three generations of the CD, each is an
improvement over its predecessor. The original 16/44.1 RBCD had less digital edge than almost any CD of that era,
possibly because it was sourced from superb analogue master tapes. The 24/96 Decca legends was, and is, still a
demonstration CD. Playing the first movement through my CD player, then the current SACD through my universal,
the difference was minor on casual listening. The difference between the original CD and the second generation
was also minor. However, my CD player is high end with an excellent digital volume control which obviates the
need for a preamp; my universal is at the lowest rung of "high end". Playing the CD and then the SACD layer of
the hybrid through the universal showed an improvement in richness even with a casual listen. Interestingly, the
difference between the SACD and CD was more evident after prolonged listening, rather than A/B cross referencing.
After I played the CD at too enthusiastic a level, my ears rang with tinnitus. This wasn"t evident on playing the
SACD, even though I suspect from the very similar sound of the hybrid CD layer, that this is the 24/96 PCM track
converted to DSD, and not an analogue to DSD transfer. The SACD definitely picked up more extraneous sound in the
opening measures. Another interesting psychoacoustic trait was that the natural volume level I gravitated to
playing the SACD was slightly lower than the CD. Not that the SACD was louder, so much as more satisfying in
richness especially over the long run.
BMG Japan have released a SACD box containing Wand"s Bruckner 4, 5, 7, 8 and 9 in live performances with the
Berlin Philharmonic ( plus a DVD "My Life, My Music" in German with Japanese subtitles). These appear to be the
same ones released internationally on CD shortly after the concerts they were spliced from. Although the Böhm is
in stereo, these discs with the exception of the Fifth have an additional multichannel remix. The box is a
sumptuous and expensive production. The CD layer of these discs have multiple index points keyed to the rehearsal
letters in the score. According to the booklet, "For the entire process of remixing and remastering, Esoteric G-
0s Rubidium master clock… Esoteric D-01A covertor and TASCAM DA-98HR Digital Recorder were used". These Esoteric
components form part of their reference SACD replay system : each monophonic DAC and master clock retails at over
US$ 10000 for each item.
Having the Wand Bruckner 9 on its original CD release, I compared it to the CD layer of the hybrid SACD. This was
definitely no rehash of the original CD layer. The new CD layer had more detail, and sounded more in-focus,
although the original CD was by no means lacking. My impression was that the BMG engineers had been able to
capture the BPO sound more faithfully than the DGG engineers had for Karajan or Abbado. Presumably, this
remastering improvement has also extended to the Wand Fourth. There is no detail on the nature of the original
digital tapes. However, it is almost certainly PCM digital, despite the relative lack of "digititis".
Artistically, this Fourth was celebrated on its release. It has much in common with the Böhm. Böhm is both more
expansive and "atmospheric" in the first movement, and more energetic in the finale, where Wand elects for
majesty over momentum. Apart from the concluding measures of the finale, where Böhm"s brass resounds over the
rest of the orchestra more tellingly than any performance either in concert or on disc that I have heard, Wand"s
finale sounds closer to the sound world of "Götterdämmerung" or Act 3 of "Siegfried". This is mainly due to the
heavier brass and plummier BPO string tone.
Both Böhm and Wand have performances which are hard to describe, as they both sound naturally "right". Wand has
some tempo slowings and abrupt changes in dynamics in the outer movements. For instance, in the first movement
there is a sudden string hush at about 13"35 to prepare for the grand peroration of the main theme by full
orchestra. These moments interestingly don"t match Furtwängler"s more extreme signposts in his 29/10/51
performance on the Tahra label.
The sound accorded to Wand is splendid, but it is close, presumably to reduce audience noise. Hence the opening
of the first movement has great texture in the string tremolandi, making CD versions sound vague. However, the
Decca engineers for Böhm had a more expansive and distant perspectve, making the strings magically appear in a
shimmer from the hall acoustic. This sounds wonderful on the SACD layer, and is surely more faithful to the
effect the composer intended. Having these two great performances on SACD is a luxury, albeit an expensive one.
Although the Wand SACD has great detail and power, on good SACD replay it would be reasonable to claim the SACD
layer of the 1973 Böhm gives the best stereo sound of any Bruckner 4 on the market, taking into account the
nature of the musical score
曲目:
Symphony No.4 in E flat major - "Romantic"
1. Bewegt, nicht zu schnell 20:14
2. Andante quasi allegretto 15:34
3. Scherzo (Bewegt) - Trio (Nicht zu schnell. Keinesfalls schleppend) 11:09
4. Finale (Bewegt, doch nicht zu schnell) 21:13 VIP用户可直接查看以下付费内容，报错点这里
/1 
发表于 2020-2-14 14:25:24
提升卡
置顶卡